Pages

14 March 2020

Michael Pakaluk on Mysteries in Our Faith

"There seem to be two basic approaches that we can take to reality and our place within it. These approaches are exclusive, and we need to choose between them. Either (1) we are set on accepting reality only insofar as it is somehow tailored to us, or (2) we accept ourselves only insofar as we are tailored to reality. The first approach is associated with self-centeredness, graspingness, and consumption. The second is related to self-abandonment, gift, and creativity. The first makes increasing demands on others and never quite finds satisfaction. The second makes diminishing demands on oneself and is effectively satisfied even from the start. Let's call these egoism and altruism. These terms aren't the best, but they are available, and, in some ways, they match the distinction I want to make.

"This difference of approach is manifested it seems in all areas of life, in matters large and small. . . ."

In a recent commentary, Dr. Michael Pakaluk, Professor of Philosophy at Catholic University of America, reflected on concerns that Catholics today are impatient of mysteries and on the place of mysteries in our faith.

To access Dr. Pakaluk’s complete essay, please visit:

Boston Pilot: Echoes: Michael Pakaluk: Mysteries in our faith (10 JAN 20)

No comments:

Post a Comment