"Everyone knows that some foods are
good and some bad. Good foods such as broccoli, kale, wheat germ, kidney
beans, and prunes should be eaten in abundance. Contrarily, junk foods
like cookies, chips, candy, sugary drinks, and ice cream are bad and
ought not to be eaten. These are the rules of right nutrition. If we do
allow ourselves to eat junk food, it is by way of exception to the rule.
Perhaps we allow the occasional 'guilty pleasure,' but even in this
allowance we admit we are guilty of transgressing the rules of food
morality.
"It's not surprising that few people
live up to these rather rigorous rules. What is surprising is that so
many accept that such rules are correct. Sure, there are some disputed
cases - we can't seem to make up our minds about eggs, for example - but in
general we accept the precepts about which foods should and shouldn't be
eaten."
In a recent commentary, Brother Dominic Koester, O.P.,
reflected on how, to be healthy, "one cannot simply avoid
certain foods and stuff himself with others. . . . Rather, one must eat many
different foods at the proper time in the proper amounts" and on how, whether considering food and/or all moral living, it is "not about being burdened under the yoke of rules, but about human flourishing."
To access Br. Dominic's complete post, please visit:
Dominicana: Dietary Morality (6 FEB 20)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment